CLOSE X

Cyber attack ‘leads to Moscow’

News
Questions are swirling over who is responsible for the security flaws exploited by hackers in the world’s biggest ransomware attack, which crippled thousands of businesses and public organisations around the world.

Because hackers exploited a security hole in some Windows versions discovered by the National Security Agency (NSA), Microsoft says the intelligence agency bears some responsibility.

“This attack provides yet another example of why the stockpiling of vulnerabilities by governments is such a problem,” Microsoft president and general counsel Brad Smith said in a blog post.

Share this story
PARTLY RESPONSIBLE? Because hackers exploited a security hole in some Windows versions discovered by the National Security Agency, Microsoft says the intelligence agency bears some responsibility for the latest ransomware attack.

Steven Weber, faculty director at the Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity at the University of California, said: “The fault is pretty distributed – there are plenty of people to blame.”

He said the NSA’s primary mission was intelligence.

“If I were sitting at the NSA, I would push that argument right back to Microsoft,” he argued. “They would say, ‘It’s our job to stockpile those weapons and use them against our adversaries’.”

Other factors were the large number of old, outdated software programs in use and often ineffective security systems.

Cornell University computer scientist Stephen Wicker blamed “profound ethical lapses” both on the part of the US government and the computing public.

The flaws “were known to the NSA and CIA, but were kept secret by those organisations to be exploited for their own data collection purposes”, Wicker said.

But he added that a large number of businesses and other users failed to install a patch issued by Microsoft in March, and also share the blame for spreading the malware.

US President Donald Trump’s homeland security adviser, Tom Bossert, dismissed the idea that the US was to blame.

“This was not a tool developed by the NSA to hold ransom data,” he told reporters. “This was a vulnerability exploit as one part of a much larger tool that was put together by the culpable parties and not by the US government.”

Microsoft effectively confirmed analysts’ diagnosis that the ransomware, known as “WannaCry”, was designed to exploit NSA software that was leaked earlier this year by a group calling itself Shadow Brokers.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Russia – which has been accused of cybermeddling in several countries – had nothing to do with the cyberattack, and criticised the US intelligence community for creating the original software. But Bruce Schneier, chief technology officer for IBM Resilient Systems, has suggested that a state-sponsored actor, most likely Russia, was probably responsible for the initial hack of the NSA.

“Whoever got this information years before and is leaking it now, has to be capable of hacking the NSA and/or the CIA, and willing to publish it all,” he said in a blog post.

“The list of countries that fit both criteria is small: Russia, China, and... I’m out of ideas.”

James Lewis, a cybersecurity specialist with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he believed the exposure of the flaw probably “leads back to Moscow”, but that the hackers who designed the malware were probably not Russian.

“One of the rules in Russia is that Russian criminals are not allowed to hack Russian targets,” he said. “This does not fit the pattern of Russian-sponsored activity.

“The cybercrime market is really innovative, and they are quick to take advantage of vulnerabilities.”

The attacks came a day after Trump signed an executive order calling for improved cybersecurity in the federal government and better co-operation with the private sector. But few see this or any single initiative as a silver bullet.

Weber said the attacks showed the risks of an over-reliance on computerised systems that were not fully secure.

“We have built an increasingly digital society on a very insecure foundation and we are starting to see the consequences of that."

He warned there was no single entity capable of fixing this problem in the near future, since security depended on so many factors.

“If you want to look for an upside, it would be that this would be a wake-up call (to improve computer security)," he said.

At the same time, Weber noted that the attack could prompt more people to shun digital technology and turn back to analogue systems that can't be hacked.

He said there were already signs that the public was losing confidence in the digital world as a result of security problems.

“For Silicon Valley and technology companies, their future depends on these underlying systems working,” he said. – AFP

Share this story
Advertisement
X